There is an interesting photo spread of the major piece, Le Carrosse on his website. This is a piece that has a strange power in that courtyard - articulating very quickly what it is you need to know. Somehow it's slightly digital language is both contemporary yet fits exactly into a memory of Versailles. It's communicating everything you need to know and using a language that we're all becoming strangely familiar with.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf633/bf633aec25a4ddb352a0db5b9c863410f80cc16d" alt=""
I suppose his work could reflect alot about technology and avatars - digital selves and identity. But that broken up form itself is nothing new. Think Cezanne or Euan Eglow. Cezanne had once set out to paint a single tree over and over, each time focusing on a sole element. Painters, sculptors and artists have always simplified forms in order to represent them. Or also Ann Gale, breaking form into, quite literally, pixels.
I find myself using alot of masking tape in my paintings lately. And I do it to get a manufactured line or shape. I'll paint in a flat, totally mechanical shape over an otherwise brushy, scraped and ragged texture. Maybe again working form into a flat shape. This is may be part of my painting language now - but in a similar way to Veilhan's work, it is mimicking an inorganic language - something picked up on from what the camera saw.
It's developing a language. As I might use photographs and memory as reference - artists before may have other varied references: sketches, live models. This changes the way we see and choose to articulate that. But ultimately artists are articulating something by abstracting it.
No comments:
Post a Comment